[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: RE: Secondary*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:00:28 -0600*Resent-Date*: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:13:29 -0600*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <H6zwnB.A.5pG.UaGA7-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz> Hi Bob, On 14 May 01, at 11:21, Tesla list wrote: > Original poster: "SIMMS, F R. (JSC-EV4) (LM) by way of Terry Fritz > <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <f.r.simms1-at-jsc.nasa.gov> > > If you look at Tesla's coils he used very few turns of heavy gauge > wire. The reasons he use so few turns is that the voltage goes up by > the Q and not the turns!!!! The lower the resistance the higher the Q > and hence the higher the Voltage. I found this out trough my friend > Jay Reed who found the highest tuning for a Tesla coil with > mathmatics. The math was varified in the lab. His coil had the exact > voltage and waveform his math predicted. > > Bob I presume he was testing using a CW source? Unfortunately, that approach has limited applicability to cap discharge systems which impart fixed energy shots to the secondary and also include a primary spark gap which loses a lot of power if the primary inductance is low. Regards, malcolm <snip>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: New Lab, Family Coil, 1st Light** - Next by Date:
**RE: ballasting problems** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Secondary** - Next by thread:
**Re: Secondary** - Index(es):