Re: Tesla's World Electrical System (was Field Mill Voltmeter

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <Mddeming-at-aol-dot-com>

In a message dated 5/4/01 7:33:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com 
writes: 



>
> Original poster: "Richard Wayne Wall by way of Terry Fritz < 
> twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com> 
>
> 5/4/01 
>
> Bill Wysock and list, 
>
> Bill the problem you point out is that most people want to analyze Teslas 
> longitudinal transmission systems in terms of orthodox transverse EM 
> transmission theory.  This absolutely cannot be done. 

 The language and 
physics 
don't permit it. 

Quite true, physics does not permit it. 
  
This presents a huge barrier in their comprehension of what's 
>
> really going on with Teslas longitudinal transmission.  Through no fault of 
> their own, they have been educationally denied the existence of transverse 
> EM 
> wave theory.  However, the "most learned" should be faulted for not keeping 
> an 
> open mind and out of hand dismissing the work and ideas of others.  The 
> history 
> of physics is riddled with the corpses of these die hard nay longitudinal. 
>
> For those who demand proof of longitudinal transmission perhaps the 
> following 
> link will interest you.  It is a US patent for a hyper-light-speed antenna 
> utilizing longitudinal propagation in another spatial dimension.  Hint: 
> Aether.  (gasp!)



Nice try. Many people on the list probably don't realize that a patent can be 
obtained for a device that never worked, or that a patent can be issued for a 
device that has never existed outside of the mind of the inventor. The only 
time the inventor is in trouble is when someone else invents a similar device 
and claims that theirs works and the original doesn't. This, of course 
doesn't prove it's not real, only that it doesn't have to be real to be 
patented. 


>
> So, here is a modern example of Teslas longitudinal transmission/reception 
> embodied in real hardware.  The concepts while a little foreign are not that 
> complicated and the antennas should be relatively easy to construct.  So, 
> time 
> to get cracking.  Eh, Malcolm? 


Unfortunately, there is no proof that working hardware is real. If one or two 
were to be built, the hardware necessary to verify trans-light speeds would 
be costly enough that few could take up the challenge. (Building it would, of 
course not seter the faithful.) 

>
> <http://www.delphion-dot-com/details?&pn=US06025810__>http://www.delphion-dot-com/d 
> etails?&pn=US06025810__ 
>
> RWW 


Matt D.