RE: Conical secondaries

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "John H. Couture by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>


Sorry - I should have changed the subject box. I agree this does create
confusion and we all should give the subject box more attention.

John Couture

-----------------------------






-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 6:58 AM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Conical secondaries


Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>"
<A123X-at-aol-dot-com>

Actually I asked about secondaries.

In a message dated 5/2/01 11:19:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:


>
> I haven't seen any test data on flat vs inverted cone primaries and will
be
> anxious to hear about what you find. It is my understanding that the
> advantage, if any, of the inverted cone is that it provides more coupling,
> more flux linkages, and more output compared to the flat primary. In other
> words the inverted cone gives the advantages of both the flat primary and
> the helical coil primary.