[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VTTC provisional results
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <FutureT-at-aol-dot-com>
In a message dated 3/19/01 9:18:17 AM Eastern Standard Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:
> - Did you connect the case of your scope to the rf ground or to the
> ground of the house wireing system?
Herwig,
I use the house ground as the RF ground also. The scope has a
plastic case, and I don't bother grounding the scope, but I used to.
I don't worry about the RF ruining anything. It seems feeble in a
tube coil.
>
> > You'll see the RF envelope on the scope.
> - This should be a perfect method for monitoring audiomodulation
> as well.
Yes, it works perfectly for that too.
>
> > I just realized, if you want to get the typical long AC type sparks
> I'm familiar with, you'll have to use just one of your phases, instead
> of 3 phases.
> - The problem was to find a suitable 1 phase HV tranny. In this
> country the mains voltage is 230 V/50 Hz and the standard
> breakers are 16 A. If you wanted more power, the only way
> (besides having installed a new wall outlet) is to use the 400 V/ 3
> phase system, which is standard in all buildings. So, when I came
> across this 3 phase HV tranny, the way to go was obvious.
Can you just use the output across two legs of the 3 phase
transformer? Even though, the power is less, the sparks may
be longer because of the single phase.
>
> > Staccato would be hard to control with three phase power since
> the power never goes to zero.
> - That is correct, especially if you used a 6 pulse full wave bridge
> rectifier.
> Another drawback of 3 phase systems is that ballasting could be
> difficult. Either you could use a 3 phase ballast at the primary side
> of the transformer or a single ballast at the secondary side. But
> this is HV....
I don't use any ballasting for a tube coil. Are you refering to the
use of a spark gap TC?
John Freau
>
> Regards,
>
> Herwig
>