Re: Modular Secondary

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>



Tesla list wrote:
> 
> Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 11 Mar 01, at 12:42, Tesla list wrote:

> 
> I was asked last year to write a follow up to my '95 article but I've
> been holding off for a number of reasons including ethical concerns
> regarding collective contributions by list members (I wasn't on any
> list at the time I wrote the original), incomplete data and
> modelling, the matter of opinion vs fact, and several other concerns.
> 

proceeds???  My experience has been that you have to pay (page charges)
when you get papers published (although, usually your employer pays the
page charges, or they get waived...)

I think we'd be better off with a series of smaller papers, rather than the
monster tutorial.  If only because it's much easier to get a 2 or 3 pager
published.

Suggestions as to journals?


>      My personal feeling is that a definitive (once and for all)
> article should be sent to a refereed and authoritative publication
> with collective acknowledgement and the proceeds go to maintenance of
> the hardware and software supporting the list. I think its too early
> to publish yet. What do others think?
> 
> Regards,
> malcolm