[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freau's efficiency theory=Success!
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <FutureT-at-aol-dot-com>
In a message dated 6/6/01 7:14:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:
> Original poster: "R.E.Burnett by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<R.
> E.Burnett-at-newcastle.ac.uk>
>
>
> Hi John, all,
>
> > I thought that adding PFC would stop the NST's (over-current) suffering.
>
> I believe this is not the case.
Hi Richie,
I see what you're saying. I had never given it that much thought before.
(I wonder what other things I haven't given enough thought?) I guess
the NST primaries are destined to always be abused in common usage.
I too like the idea of designing large systems for a good power factor
without PFC. I guess the thing with those NST's is to not let them
get too hot (among other things, ho ho).
Cheers,
John Freau
--
>
> A PFC capacitor connected across the primary of an NST draws a reactive
> current from the supply which is 180 degrees out of phase with the
> reactive part of the NST current. The supply current is the sum of these
> two currents. So the inductive part of the NST current is cancelled by
> the capacitive current drawn by the PFC.
>
> This reduces the overall current drawn from the supply line, but the
> windings of the NST still see the same total current with or without
> PFC. It is only the line current which is reduced by cancelling the
> reactive contribution. However, PFC is still worthwhile as reduced line
> current makes life easier for the Variac, circuit breakers and wiring.
>
> This is one of the reasons why I believe that larger systems should be
> designed with high PF in mind from the outset. A poor power factor in
> a large system burdens the transformer and ballast, and requires a lot of
> PFC capacitance to make a significant improvement in the power factor.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Richie,
>