[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Safety Gap Puzzle
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <Hollmike-at-aol-dot-com>
Greg,
It might be that your main gap missed a firing and consequently allowed
your primary cap to be charged to a higher voltage before the safety gap
fired. Since the stored energy of the cap is proportional to the voltage
squared, this would dump more energy into your primary coil. You'd think the
center electrode would dissipate the current into ground, but since the other
electrode has an opposite polarity, it is probably a more desirable path for
the current to flow rather than to ground. This would then amount to having
a multiple static gap that maybe quenched the arc better than your normal
gap. If that is the case, then it also could have helped to improve the
streamer output.
One other possibility occurs to me. Usually the resistance of the
primary circuit is not included in the resonance calculations. This makes
design a bit less cumbersome, and the tuning is done by trial and error to
compensate for the slight error. Perhaps the resistors in your safety gap
system actually improved the tuning if your tap point was just slightly off
from the most optimal point. This is just a guess, but it could be a
possibility anyway.
Mike