Re: Conical Secondary

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Bert Hickman by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-net>

Chris,

It really shouldn't matter very much - I'd go with the larger diameter
on the base to make it somewhat more stable. 

-- Bert --
-- 
Bert Hickman
Stoneridge Engineering
Email:    bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-net
Web Site: http://www.teslamania-dot-com

Tesla list wrote:
> 
> Original poster: "Chris Snyder by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <csnyder-at-ga.prestige-dot-net>
> 
> Hey list,
> 
>     My secondary form is slightly conical, only less than an inch, but it
still
> raised a question... Would it be better to have the smaller end on the bottom
> or top? At first I thought at the bottom because I imagined it would be more
> "in contact" with the primary field. Last night though, I saw a page with
> somebody having the smaller end on top and now I'm not sure... Any
thoughts? Oh
> yea, my primary is a flat spiral. Thanks everyone
> 
> -Chris Snyder

-- 
Bert Hickman
Stoneridge Engineering
Email:    bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-net
Web Site: http://www.teslamania-dot-com