Re: RQ gap spacing theory question

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Teri Mckenney by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <mck-at-ezy-dot-net>

Hey Ed,
So you're adjustable in  .028 increments.No more, no less.
Billy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: RQ gap spacing theory question


> Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com>
>
> In a message dated 12/4/01 5:38:49 PM Pacific Standard Time,
tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> writes:
>
>
> >
> > Hey Bart,All,
> > Does this mean the space's between the gaps don't have to be equally
spaced?
> > If not , then would it be okay to permanently fix all but the end piece
of
> > copper, and make the last one adjustable?
> > Billy
>
>
>
> I don't see why any of the copper pipe sections needs to be adjustable.
The
> gaps that I have made use seven or eight pipe sections with gaps about
.028".
> Each is mounted with brass bolts that allow you to wire in however many
gap
> sections that you want.  If you want a higher voltage gap, use more
sections -
> lower, use less.
>
> Ed Sonderman
>
>
>
>