[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Geek Gap Mark-1
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
On 13 Apr 01, at 12:45, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>"
> <uncadoc-at-juno-dot-com>
>
> Hi all list members; Geek #1 and company. Hey, you know what? We
> tried our two 15/60 modified neon supply into our 6" dia.x23" tall
> coil with our array of barium titanate caps, and you know what? IF we
> detune our coil by about 1 turn on the primary(more or less). We
> found that the spark output from the top terminal has the same length.
> In other words, all that big fat toriod on top of your Tesla is doing
> is just making the spark look more impressive by moving the actual
> discharge of the top of the secondary to a plane that is simply
> further from the center of the coil itself, in relationship to the
> largeness of topload you apply. IMO the spark length is the same
> with or without a toroid. We can now see that if the coil is tuned
> properly that it will give the same size spark output regardless of
> the toroid. It is simply a matter of tuning the tank for optimum
> output. We can get a 6 foot multiple nasty spark off our secondary
> using a 1/4" toggle bolt as a topload. And if we wish , then we can
> set up the primary tuning to accommodate a giant 6"x24"toroid to get
> the same amount of spark. Then we lay up and tune the coil for an
> additional 6"x24" toroid atop the first one. The double toriods look
> mighty impressive, but the spark length as rated tuned output from the
> secondary is the same! The Toroid size does not seem to have any
> impact on our coil at all. We found that our coils do NOT need a
> monster topload for maximum output. We can tune it to produce nasty
> sparks that just grow and grapple for the upper atmosphere with no
> topload at all. Could this be a result of the barium titanate cap tank
> we are using? No, I think not! We seem to see a mass multitude
> trying to get bigger sparks from their coils with a bigger topload.
> But what we have found with our experimentation, that is not the case
> at all! I think all that most coilers are doing is deceiving
> themselves by exaggerating the amount of spark they get from a toroid
> topload. Yeah, a big fat nasty looking toroid! A 2" brass ball on
> your secondary would give just as much spark. The toriods just extend
> the spark area.... Maybe the perceived extension of spark on the
> secondary is just a matter of good tuning! I think too many list
> members swear by the toroid topload. I think it is baloney! Tune
> well and give top Capacitance to the air around you! Reach out and you
> shall receive! JMO. Al
An interesting test would be to use the same primary coupled to the
same value of k with two different secondaries, one which is tuned
with a topload and one which tunes correctly without. Have you done
this? One thing that does happen when one fits a larger topload is
that the primary inductance is increased to maintain tune and that
does lower primary losses to a degree.
Malcolm