[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Inverse tc??

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Inverse tc??
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 04:13:33 -0600
In-Reply-To: <F99yWtIIZS2TRqf69aZ000018d7-at-hotmail-dot-com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 04:42:05 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <vJh0rB.A.QCF.6ft16-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>

Hi Erik,

Greg Leyh's Electrum does this.  See:

http://www.lod-dot-org/electrum.html

Cheers,

	Terry

At 05:01 PM 4/12/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Whats to stop from putting the primary INSIDE the secondary??
>If you have a large enough secondary, and you use a vertical primary...
>i dont see why it wouldent work, but, i dont have a clue...
>
>??????
>
>Erik
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn-dot-com
>

Prev by Date: Inverse tc??
Next by Date: Big flex duct
Prev by thread: Inverse tc??
Next by thread: Big flex duct
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread