[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:37:41 -0600
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech
> Question
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Original Poster: "Ruud de Graaf" <rdegraaf-at-daxis.nl>
>
> > Original Poster: "Bill Parn" <parn-at-starpower-dot-net>
> >
> > > Original Poster: "Ed Phillips" <evp-at-pacbell-dot-net>
<snip>
To Ruud, Bill, Ed, et. al.
The writing below has cuase me to respond by saying that indeed,
Tesla's system of wireless power transmission _was not_ Hertzian
(TEM) electromagnetic wave propagation through the air as we all
know it and employ it today in all our modes of communications,
but rather a surface-launched wave over the sphere of the earth.
Right now, there are folks who are working very hard to prove what
Tesla said, more then 100 years ago; that indeed there is another
mode of electric wave propagation, and it doesn't attenuate by the
1/r(sq) law that classical Hertzian transverse electro-magnetic wave
propagation encounters. This (novel) method of propagating electric
energy was completely known to Tesla (and others that followed
him like Zenneck, and Waite.) Tesla never once violated Maxwell's
full set of equations.
I know that my "statements" here on this list will likely be viewed
as unfounded or ill-educated. But as Tesla himself said on may
occasions. Let them have it. They work for today...I work for
tomorrow.
I am 100% conviced that the time is very near, when we will all
comprehend what Tesla stated as natural law and fact, back in
1899-1900.
Respectfully,
Bill Wysock.
> The problem with 'Wireless Power Transmission' and 'Herzian waves' was that
> Tesla believed they were not the same and that 'his waves' could travel the
> earth without much loss. This of course is fiction, because they where the
> same.
>
> Ruud de Graaf
>
>
>
>
>
___________________________
Tesla Technology Research