[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Seconday form length question
> Original Poster: "Bob Berg" <berg_bob-at-hotmail-dot-com>
>
> Would it hurt performance if I leave an extra 12 - 16" of PVC at the end
> (bottom) of my seconday. (Unwound) I want to have the seconday pass through
> the top of the support table and and secure it at the base. Of course I
> would only have the winding from where I needed from the primary up 22-24
> inches (4.5" seconday). This will also allow me to adjust coupling by
> allowing me to move it up or down.
That will not affect performance in any way.
> --- Has anyone come up with a way to adjust coupling while the coil is
> running? some kind of motorized system that would allow the operater to
> raise or lower the seconday while the coil is running? Sounds interesting.
Given what you propose, I can envision some kind of lever system. Like this:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Secondary form
| |
upper tube | |
| | |
\----->|| || Primary Platform
=========|| ||=========
|| ||
| |
| |
_____________________|_______|___________________________ Your Hand
O_________________________________________________________ (far away)
Pivot | | Lever tube
on | |
insulator | |
|| ||
|| ||
|| ||
Base---->| |
tube | | Base
=============================
Sorry for the ASCII art, that horizonal-ish line is supposed to represent a
very long lever of non-conductive material, such as plastic tubing, anchored
at one end, and going through holes in the bottom of the form. And the
secondary PVC form is resting inside a slightly larger diameter piece of
tube (actually two) used to keep the form normal to the ground (straight up
and down).
Ideally, the tube would align best if there was a supporting ring of tubing
above and below the point where the lever goes through.
This may be a sucky design, but it's a start, right?
-Adam
adamsmith-at-mediaone-dot-net