[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 250,000 volt nuclear transformer
-
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: 250,000 volt nuclear transformer
-
From: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
-
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 13:45:04 -0700
-
Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
-
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme
-
In-Reply-To: <CLBCLBBINNPCLJGLNPNPEEFJCGAA.gemware2-at-dreamscape-dot-com>
Hi Andy,
What an odd toy ;-)) With a transformer like that you may not need a TC
;-)) If it is not current limited you could ballast it and draw big power
arcs off it ;-)) I nice Jacobs ladder!!!
First, Be vary carful when testing this thing. It may make put a pole
transformer to shame in it's killing ability!! If you can find out exactly
what is in it you would be ahead. If it is just a transformer. You can
certainly hook it up in reverse to get 250kV on the terminals!! I wonder
if it has an internal capacitor or something like that?? I used to work on
capacitive couple line voltage transducers but they were all capacitors
with only a drain inductor. I wonder if that's what this is. In that
case, it would not be a transformer at all though. A picture, especially
of the low voltage side connections, would be useful. If it is just two
terminal marked 120 VAC and has the obvious weight of a transformer, then
it probably is just what they say.
I have a hard time imagining what you would do with it for a Tesla coil
but this "opportunity" has not been pondered before....
Be real careful with that thing!!
Cheers,
Terry
At , you wrote:
> I recently bought a transformer that steps down 250,000 volts to 115 volts,
>formerly used in a nuclear power plant. It weighs about 1000 lbs. and is at
>least 5 feet tall. I think it said that it was a capacitively coupled
>potential transformer. I was wondering if you could hook it up in reverse
>and get 250,000 volts? Are pole pigs connected in reverse for high voltage?
>Unfortunately I don't have it now, because I couldn't get it home to test.
>If anyone knows if it will work or have any other comments then please
>respond. Thanks,
>
>-Andy
>