RE: TC Primary Capacitors.

["Richard Kircher" <richard.kircher-at-worldnet.att-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)]

John, 
	I was referring to the same freebee Ver 3.1 as you were in your comment
about it, that's what confused me.  I thought I was missing something in
the Ver 3.1   Sorry about the confusion.
Dick


At 09:22 PM 7/29/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Original poster: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net> 
>
>
>Dick -
>
>You now know why the JHCTES Ver 3.1 is a freebee. The Ver 4 will have this
>information and much more. The catch is that it will not be a freebee. (:>(
>
>It will be ready in the near future.
>
>John Couture
>
>------------------------
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
>Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 8:35 PM
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: Re: TC Primary Capacitors.
>
>
>Original poster: "Richard Kircher" <richard.kircher-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
>
>John,
>	I could not find a way to make your program compute the size of the
>primary capacitor.  The version 3.1 that I tried requires the capacitor
>size to be an INPUT not an Output of the program.  What am I missing?
>Dick
>
>
>At 06:03 PM 7/28/00 -0600, you wrote:
>>Original poster: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
>>
>snip...
>
>>The Ver 3.1 (JHCTES) cap appears to be a good choice because the efficiency
>>is reasonable and it is not a "sweet spot" capacitor. Most coilers use caps
>>about this size for this size NST.
>
>snip...
>