[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Liquid Capacitor



>Original Poster: "Joe Thuss" <jbthuss-at-execulink-dot-com>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 4:35 PM
>Subject: Re: Liquid Capacitor
>
>
> >Original Poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux-at-jpl.nasa.gov>
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> >To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> >Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 6:58 AM
> >Subject: Liquid Capacitor
> >
> >
> >>Original Poster: "Christopher Boden" <chrisboden-at-hotmail-dot-com>
> >>
> >>What are all the conducting liquids with a lower density than Quaker 
>State
> >>Synthetic Oil that conduct better than or equal to saltwater?
> >
> >You are aware that you can get oil that is denser than water?
> >Why not use mercury on the bottom, then dense oil, then salt water (I 
>like
> >CuSO4) on top..
>
>
>Instead of mercury, why not use some kind of metal plate on the bottom. It
>would probably by a lot less toxic, as well as cheaper.
>
>
That and other than cracking a TON of mercury switches, it's rather hard to 
come by.

Chris "Non-Toxic" Boden
The Geek Group

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail-dot-com