[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tube coil ideas
Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> on 13.02.2000 20:37:34
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
cc: (bcc: Marco Denicolai/MARTIS)
Subject: Tube coil ideas
>Original Poster: "Edwin G. Buttell" <edd.b-at-snet-dot-net>
> So what would happen if we pulsed our 833-A example ???.
>
> A variable oscillator with a saw/tooth output from ... say
> 50Kc to 200Kc driving a voltage amp ( 6L6 ) biased AB1 to a
> power amp ( 2 / 6L6 ) biased Class C .... this is how we change
> from a saw/tooth to a pulse. Next is a driver stage having
> about 25 or 30 watts output, an 807 in class C should do it.>>
> It's not that complicated, it would be all tubes, nothing
> small and modern to burn up, no tuned circuits in the amp
> or driver and with the 50% duty cycle that we obtained by
> pulsing the 833-A ( which is now biased class C ) a higher
> input power can be used without exceeding the max plate
> dissipation. The last benefit but certainly not the least
> is the efficiency of the pulsed 833-A , it will be or should
> be 90% or better.
> Comments anyone ??????
> Edd.B
Hi.
I am a tube-design ignorant but your solution sounds good to me. Just one
stupid
question: what you will win using tube devices
instead of a spark gap ? Don't you still need the NST or an equivalent voltage
source?
Regards