[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Hydrogen gap
In many of the discussions I have seen on hydrogen gaps, they use the
alcohol vapor to actually make the hydrogen on the fly (by dissociation).
The idea being that you put some alcohol in the bottom of the chamber, heat
it up until the vapor has displaced all the air, then seal the chamber.
This is described in some detail in Fruengel's book..
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 6:49 AM
Subject: Hydrogen gap
>Original Poster: Mike Nolley <mnolley-at-mail.slc.edu>
>
> As you all probably recall, I'm working on a hydrogen gap-driven coil.
I
>plan to start it this summer, and right now I'm in the design phase. It is
to
>be loosely modeled on Poulsen systems, in that it will be CW, include
>copper and
>graphite electrodes and might also include exterior Neodymium magnets for
>quenching.
>
> There will be 9 gaps in series, alternating between copper and graphite
>electrodes, the copper ones consisting of 1/2 inch tubing with pipe caps as
the
>gap surface--the graphite electrodes would be encased in larger 3/4 inch
>tubing. Both would be cooled with alchohol from the inside. The issue is,
I
>plan to pump the alchohol from one electrode to another thru vinyl tubing.
>Would there be a significant current leakage through the alchohol? The
second
>element of the gap which needs work is the hydrogen quenching. The gap
will be
>enclosed by a 2-3 foot aluminum box, composed of 2 half-boxes TIG welded
>together. Will the Tig welds be embrittled significantly by the hydrogen?
Or
>does that only occur at high pressures? I plan to pump the hydrogen
>through the
>gap slowly-- would it be more cost effective to use the pressure from the
tank
>and somehow recycle it, or use a pump? Would I be able to use a
conventional
>pump, or is this just a pipe dream, if you'll excuse the pun? I'd like to
know
>how feasible this project will be, given my price limit of around $500-$700
>(The DC power supply and probably the current limiting are taken care of).
> I'd appreciate any comments.
> --Mike
>
>
>