[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sync gap test 1
Original poster: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com
Well, I had a bit of a set back last night. I tried my 3.0" coil with the
new rotary sync gap and a larger than resonant cap, going up from .008 ufd to
.032 ufd. Two electrodes were removed from the rotor so I would now have 120
bps (3600 rpm motor and two electrodes). The gap spacing is set to about
.030" and it fires through 4 gaps total each time it fires. I spun the gap
up to speed and then started cranking up the variac that controls power to
the neon sign transformers. I had to turn the variac up quite a ways (maybe
70 to 80%) before I got any sparks. Then I had them everywhere. Both safety
gaps fired (set to about .30") I had sparks in the primary, from the primary
to the strike rail and from the primary to the secondary. I tried about
three motor positions (phase control of the gap) and it didn't get much
better.
John Freau, I can see how you get such long sparks from your system. Going
down to a low break rate and using a very large cap puts a whole lot of power
into the system. More than I was ready for I guess. This morning I removed
the secondary, used a scotch brite pad to remove as much of the black at each
spot as possible and coated each spot with several coats of clear finger nail
polish.
We just had a discussion recently about racing sparks on the secondary. I
wasn't part of the discussion, but If I remember correctly, racing sparks are
caused by improper tuning and sparks breaking out low in the secondary are
caused by overcoupling. With this in mind, I will raise the secondary up by
.75", that is all the spacers that I have cut right now. Then I will
reinstall the static gap and see if my secondary still works ok. Then I will
disconnect one of the transformers so I have only 12 kv at 30 ma. Now switch
back to the .032 ufd cap and get the tuning spot on. Then finally reinstall
the new rotary sync gap and try it again.
Comments?
Ed Sonderman