[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Variac setting (Was Rd: Rotaty popping)
>
> Original Poster: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com
Hi Ed,
In this reply you made to John, I noticed your variac setting and reaction to
change is **identical** to my variac setting and reaction. I too have little
change in performance with movement of the wiper to about 25% or so. I also
find my best performance just about center of the variac. This makes me wonder
why we are seeing such a similar reaction. I believe we are both using a variac
and series resistor combo (my smoothing resistor is 2.5 ohms). I wonder if
others using this setup with a pig or potential xfmr are seeing the same type
of reaction? I find this fascinating - because I don't understand why. Your
ballast is a 40A and my ballast is 30A. BTW, I measured my variac (setting at
mid winding) at 11.2mH. I would assume yours is a bit more (maybe 16mH or so).
Does anyone else see this similarity? Does anyone have a theory why?
Bart
>
> As an addition to an earlier reply of mine, I am a couple of days behind here
>
> - the 5,000 watt variac that I am using as ballast for my 5kva transformer, I
>
> believe is saturating. It is rated for 120 volts, 5,000 watts which should
> be good for about 40 amps. My typical primary current is around 30 amps. It
>
> does groan a little however. I really don't want to cut the core. An
> interesting thing to note is that the best performance from the coil does not
>
> come from a particular tight setting on the ballast variac. I now have it
> set about in the center, and it really does not change the performance if I
> move it either way up to maybe 25%.
>
> Again, the reason I went to the variac instead of the welder was to prevent
> an unwanted 60 HZ resonance that was causing extremely high primary voltages
> and destroying my caps. The variac also fixed the problem of the popping
> sound in the rotary. My original configuration with the welder and using
> about 1.5 ohms of series resistance also seemed to run better at lower welder
>
> settings, which would be with higher inductance. I haven't measured the
> inductance of the variac, but I would guess from looking at it that it would
> be considerably less than the welder.
>
> Ed Sonderman