[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Needle Glow Discharge/ Malcolm comments on Corum
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:22:49 -0600, Tesla List wrote:
> Original Poster: "Ed Phillips" <evp-at-pacbell-dot-net>
>
> > There is such a thing known as the Heisenberg
Uncertainty Principle.
> > A quick rehash of that simply means that we change
what we try to
observe by
> > our method of observation.
>
> The uncertainty statement applies at the quantum
or microscopic level.
> At the macroscopic or real-world level that the
effects of the
> observation are completely predictable if the
experimenter is careful
> enough to measure and correct for all disturbances.
>
> This principle does not appear to hold in the
> > construction of tesla coils because L and C of the
primary tank circuit
are
> > designed for secondary considerations, if an
improper secondary
arrangement
> > is inserted into that space, it does not resonate.
However it is
entirely
> > possible to create a situation where ANY coil will
reasonably resonate
at
> > its own ringing freq when inserted into a special
kind of high freq
field.
> > This is done by creating a circuit condition
whereby the postulated and
> > observed magnetic fields from scope observations
can instantaneously
> > reverse directions and polarity. The mechanism for
this is not entirely
> > understood, but stands the total theoretical test
of observation of
> > causitive circuit considerations.
>
> I've read this a couple of times and don't
understand what is being
> said. Does anyone?
>
Probably not, so I will attempt to clarify. The proof is
in the results. To
do this experimental proof one needs two large
inductors, preferably air
core, two capacities that will resonant with those
inductors at 60 hz or the
supply freq. It may be possible to use a signal
generator instead of the
supply freq from the wall. That will make securing the L
and C quantities an
easier job. One will also need an LCR meter to determine
L and C values if
necessary. A oscilloscope must be used to see the action
of the magnetic
fields from the coils, I do this by using a many winded
air core inductor
placed in the vicinity of those coils magnetic field,
however other methods
might be used, I just didnt want any high voltage spikes
from the process to
injure my scope, so I used an induction sensor to see
what is going on in
the magnetic field. First take the 2 coils and 2
capacitors in series on two
seperate branches, thus making a tank circuit with the
elements in series.
Now REVERSE ONE set of L and C values, so that
schematically each one
has
been juxtaposed or replaced with the other.
Now the circuit is something entirely different, instead
of being a tank
circuit with identical values of L and C in series on
each side, it has
become two branches in parallel, each with L and C in
series, making a new
condition known as series resonance on each branch, with
the IMPORTANT
distiction that each series resonance is 180 out of
phase with the other,
because of their relative positions in the schematic to
each other, as
being an opposite orientation in series to the source
input. This is very
important because if they are simply 2 identical LC
series quantities in
parallel, the next step will indicate nothing. Now if
one has gone this far
the next step is an oscilloscope measurement of those
magnetic fields. Now
run a wire or short between the midpoint of each LC
series resonance, or the
part of the circuit BETWEEN L and C, while monitoring
the magnetic field.
One will then see the polarity of that magnetic field
reversed 180 degrees.
This is because that connection across the midpoints has
converted the 180
phased series resonances, into a tank circuit of special
qualities, which I
have named the Binary Resonant Circuit. It is simply the
original
description of a dual series L and C tank circuit
twisted into a figure 8,
this action does not change it from being a tank
circuit, even though a new
midpoint pathway has been established. The reactive
currents of the tank
circiut simply share this pathway from opposite
directions, and since they
are themselves 180 out of phase, they are in unity
across that pathway, and
will show twice the amperage on that pathway than on
either reactive current
alone measured on the sides of the figure 8. Now simply
removing the short,
will revert the condition back to series resonance. The
currents in a series
resonance are in phase with the impressed voltage, the
currents in a
parallel resonance are 180 out of phase with the
impressed voltage, thus
each magnetic field from each process will be opposite
or 180 out of phase.
What I have simply done is to discover a switch: the
open position gives
series resonance, the closed parallel resonance. By
using huge inductors the
voltage rise from the q of the coils in series resonance
can create an arc
that will jump the midpont gap, when that midpoint path
has a small air gap.
This causes a short and returns the schematic to a tank
circuit, thus
reversing the polarity of the magnetic fields. In that
condition the
magnetic field observations will show something
considered almost
impossible, two 180 forms blinking on and off. The
problem in making the
experimental observations is that hardly any magnetic
field will be observed
in the tank configuration because q times less current
enters the coils in
that case, this might be compensated by turning the
voltage range of the
scope up on that portion of the observation.
Additionally a smaller inductor will probably never make
enough voltage rise
to create an arcing on the midpoint arc gap. The volume
of current is
usually much smaller during the tank circuit phase, also
the voltage rise
enabled by series resonance vanishes on condition of
short, enabling the arc
to rapidly extinguish or quench itself, making it ideal
for a high freq
oscillation. Now when many different inductors of
diffrent sizes are put
into this type of high freq field, each one will show
that field at a
different freq. This is what I meant by the Heisenberg
gig, I know it doesnt
apply, or does it?
How can we know what the real vibration is when each of
our measuring
instruments gives a different result. HDN
PS; the Needle Glow Discharge is a modification of this
midpoint arc gap
done by placing a 31,250 hz designed BRS inside a larger
voltage BRS
Binary Resonant System
http://www.insidetheweb-dot-com/mbs.cgi/mb124201