[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: why 1:5 and max 1000? (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:59:57 +1200
From: Malcolm Watts <malcolm.watts-at-wnp.ac.nz>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: why 1:5 and max 1000? (fwd)
Hi Arwin,
The 5:1 aspect ratio together with the 1000 turns is a
guide that will get you a secondary with a good Q. Using this guide
forces you to use a winding wire with a suitable thickness that offers
a balance between inductance and resistance. Note also that if you
use this guide and space wind a coil, you do pretty much the same
if the wire thickness is not less than half the inter-turn distance.
Space winding is more hassle but does save on wire costs. The
reason why there is not much difference between the two has to do
with a reduced proximity effect for the space wind.
Regards,
Malcolm
> Original Poster: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 21:10:15 +0200
> From: arrie <solva-at-xs4all.nl>
> To: "tesla-at-pupman-dot-com" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: why 1:5 and max 1000?
>
> Dear all, after having build a few small tcīs i am collecting now the
> pieces for a large one. Having a 10" sec. form, 2x 8000 kv 700mA, 2
> selfrolled polycaps (56+42 nF) and a rebuild static gap with cooling
> bodies as seen on the net somwhere (where???). i a looking forward to
> assemvble the whole thing.
>
> What bothers me is that i donīt understand the max prractical ratio
> of 1:5 and the max turns of 1000. Are thes practical values or can it
> be calculated with which formulas???
>
> Thanks, Arwin Holland
>