[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Secondary Theory (Was Bipolar Coil)-Heretical view
On Sun, 23 May 1999 20:20:31 -0600, Tesla List wrote:
> Original Poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br>
>
> Dr. Resonance wrote:
>
> > If you have a medium to large coil try this experiment. Remove the sec
coil
> > and place it 8-10 feet away on a suitable insulating stand. Now tap
into
> > the normal primary coil and feed this to the bottom of the sec coil.
It
> > does require some retuning and is a bit more difficult as you now have
two
> > taps to more around, but the results are very interesting. I would ask
> > anyone on the list to try this with some of their coils -- you will be
> > amazed at how well this works out. You can eventually enclosed the
pri
> > with taps into a large box and just feed the output over to your
elevated
> > sec coil.
>
> This is known in old literature as the Seibt circuit:
> The excitator: http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/ressona1.jpg
> Secondary coils: http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/ressona2.jpg
> The interconnection: http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/ressona3.jpg
> The complete circuit: http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/eln4382.jpg
> A variation: http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/mk95943.jpg
>
> Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
Given the fact that the primary and secondary
are no longer magnetically coupled in this
circuit (thats what I understand is being done here),
does not this diminish the arcing effects on
the secondary as compared with the same model in a conventional magnetically
coupled sense? HDN
_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite-dot-com/