[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Secondary Theory (Was Bipolar Coil)-Heretical view
Yes, but it does require considerably more investigation.
Regards,
Dr.Resonance
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Thursday, May 20, 1999 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: Secondary Theory (Was Bipolar Coil)-Heretical view
>Original Poster: "B**2" <bensonbd-at-erols-dot-com>
>
>Hi D. C., Terry, All,
> Are you suggesting the possibility that there are oscillations
>among the capacities of the secondary themselves? Perhaps an energy
>loss mechanism scaled with secondary size?
>Wouldn't this show up as a deviation from the calculated R, L, C
>lumped frequency model?
>
>I personally think more
>investigation should be done regarding the transfer of energy from
>turn to
>turn as this may be a very significant source of energy transfer along
>the
>secondary coil. These effects would also help to explain some of the
>rather
>weird differences between present theory and practice.
>
>Food for thought.
>
>Regards,
>
>Dr.Resonance
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Date: Monday, May 17, 1999 7:12 PM
>Subject: Re: Secondary Theory (Was Bipolar Coil)-Heretical view
>
>
>>Original Poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
>>
>>Hi Jim,
>>
>> It is very true that using the three lumped parameters (Lsec.,
>Cself, and
>snip........
>