RE: Thorated vs. Pure Tungsten

the best way is to ball the end of the tungsten is to put it in a tig torch
set the welder to dc reverse about 200 to 300 amp range and weld with it for
a few seconds that will make a big ball even lager Dia. then the tungsten at
the tip perfect for welding al. I think that would give you the best results
as far as grinding 2% I do it every day and I am not dead yet.

hope this helps.
>From Gary Pedro

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 5:31 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Thorated vs Pure Tungsten

Original Poster: Doug Brunner <dabrunner-at-earthlink-dot-net>

I disagree with the part about a cobalt drill--my own set of cobalt bits is
for hardened steel alloys and stainless steel, which is representative of
ball bearings I've seen.

I could be wrong about this; if so, please tell me, so I don't ruin my bits
something that I thought they could get through!

Tesla List wrote:

> Original Poster: Bill Fuller <wfuller-at-home-dot-com>
> I doubt that a cobalt drill will cut into a ball bearing!
> I've just completed an "air blast" spark gap. I used 1/4" solid carbide
> (sintered) end
> mills for the spark gap electrodes. These were broken on the cutting side
> but flat and
> smooth on the shaft end. They seemed to work good for the short time  used
> them (blew
> my cap). There is absolutely no wear in the surface. The ends were not
> rounded and you
> can see some black marks all around the edge suggesting all the arcs came
> from these
> there. I'll bet rounding the ends will help localize the arc and reduce
> dwell
> time. It would also keep the arc in the air stream.  There are mounted
> 1.25"
> aluminum bar stock with 1/2" deep concentric grooves cut into it to keep
> cool.
> Any comments on using carbide??
> Tesla List wrote:
> > Original Poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
> >
> >         Today I replaced the 2% thorium electrodes with pure tungsten.
> The gaps
> > actually fired much sooner with pure tungsten??  However the firing
> > was more stable.
> >
> >         I think the firing voltage depends mostly on the rather sharp
> edges I left
> > on the rods.  I will try to really round them out and see if that helps
> > stability.  In retrospect, the sharp edges only make high field stress
> > points.  However, the thorium electrodes do seem to suffer much more
> > ionization caused by the radioactivity and thus like to sporadically
> > far too early.  I may end up using ball bearing electrodes to get a much
> > more stable firing voltage for the safety gaps.  I assume cobalt drill
> > will cut through ball bearings to mount the shafts that hold them?...
> >
> >         I definitely would stay away from thorium and other radioactive
> > electrodes.  Pure tungsten is supposed to wear faster but the worry of
> > radioactive dust getting in one's lungs during the difficult cutting and
> > grinding of this gnarly material out weighs that.  "Playing" with the
> > tungsten is far better than worrying about dust particles from the
> > or cesium, or lanthanum...  Some claim good wear from non radioactive
> > alloys of tungsten too, but this is getting to be too complex as it
> >
> > http://www.arcsmith-dot-com/wni/products/tungsten/tungsten.htm
> >
> > explains much about these rods...
> >
> > I still find myself strangely drawn to the 3/8 inch diameter rods :-))
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >         Terry
> >
> > BTW - If all elsa fails, I still have 100+ Victoreen gaps :-)...