Re: Bang size and break-rate

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Bang size and break-rate
From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:21:39 -0600
Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme


  Finn -

  The tube shape would be the best provided the area of the copper is as
recommended by the program.

  John Couture

-------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Friday, June 11, 1999 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: Bang size and break-rate


>Original Poster: Finn Hammer <f-hammer-at-post5.tele.dk>
>
>Tesla List skrev:
>>
>> Original Poster: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
>>
>
>>
>>   As mentioned before on this List the magnetic flux linking the primary
>> coil to the secondary coil is a function of current times turns normally
>> called "ampere turns". You can reduce the turns without affecting the
flux
>> linkages if the primary current is increased. The problem is that coilers
do
>> not make the primary wiring large enough for the increased current. A
>> computer program should take this into account.
>
>Yes, maybe...
>
>> The JHCTES program
>> recommends a wire size (in square inches) to make this adjustment.
>
>Considering the skin-effect, would it not be more appropriate to suggest
>the _circomference_ of the wire, tube or strap ?.
>
>Cheers, finn
>>
>>   John Couture