Re: This phase shift stuff...

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: This phase shift stuff...
• From: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz> (by way of Terry Fritz <twf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 19:02:29 -0700
• Approved: twf-at-verinet-dot-com

There might be a reality check:

> Original Poster: "becyn comunication" <becyn-at-hotmail-dot-com> 

<snip>
> My money is on your "Top load in sync with the standing wave" 
> statement. Since E and I are only in phase at resonance, no 
> difference should be detectable at any given point. If this were
> the case ,microwave waveguides would have massive losses in their
> centers do to reflections caused by gradual phase change. As we know 
> it facilitates the propagation of the standing wave with good 
> efficiency. I believe a similar facilitation occurs in the lumped
> TC by feild placement creating the "standing wave". The current
> flowing through the inductance does not change along it's length
> unless your equipment creates a current loop at that point! 
> Futhermore, some false phase shift may be interpreted due to the
> ratio of the base loading impedance to the location of the probe
> (Xl)along the length. 
> 
> Does anyone share this view?
> 
> Jim McVey

Shouldn't the peak secondary V*I at the top be less than the initial
peak primary V*I product?

Malcolm

• Prev: Cheap DMM
• Next: how big a spark should I expect
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread