Re: Tesla Coil Operation - was "Harmonics"

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Tesla Coil Operation - was "Harmonics"
• From: Ed Phillips <evp-at-pacbell-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 22:29:15 -0700
• Approved: twf-at-verinet-dot-com

"Inefficient compared to what Antonio? I think Tesla was basing the
eficiency models on the resonance matching the earth's natural resonance
via standing wave.
 Maybe I'm wrong, but if he caused an earthquake around New York City
via a small oscillator in resonance, I'd say efficiency was much higher
than what one would expect from a small instrument.
I believe it's the same thing he was proposing via Wardencliff. Once the
earth resonance was brought into tune,(like pushing a swing),I don't
think it would take much to keep it going...

Bob V"

	What earthquake?  What are the documented measurements???  Ground
shaking yes (in this case REAL surface waves), earthquake no.  As for
how much power it would take to keep the earth "going", it would be most
of that being transmitted.

Ed

• Prev: Re: Tesla Coil Operation - was "Harmonics"
• Next: Re: Tesla coil tuner (grid-dip meter)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread