[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Now, How does a coil really work??
This looks like old ground being worked over again:
> Original Poster: Bryan Work <bryan-at-apexrad-dot-com>
>
>
>
>
> > Original Poster: Scott Stephens <Scott2-at-mediaone-dot-net>
> > >However, the way I understand resonant rise (maybe this is incorrect
??) is
> > >that the output energy of the coil will be greater than what you "stuff"
> into
> > >the primary. This would violate the energy conservation laws and I don|t
> see
> > >how this is possible.
>
> You are neglecting the energy stored in the oscillation itself.
> The energy continues to add to the Fres oscillation current without
breakout
> until the
> capacitance of the toroid is exceeded.
>
> I am going to describe a fluid system as an allegory to a TC.
> The primary is a fluid drive which powers a paddle wheel (the paddles are
> magnetic
> flux lines in a TC) The paddle is immersed in a long tank (the TC on it's
> side).
> One end of the tank is open to a large pool (ground) the other end is open
> to a
> small basin (toroid).
>
> The paddle is driven first one way then reverses and is driven the other
way.
> The reversal is synchronized to the wave pattern in the long tank.
> At first there is little current of the waves. As more oscillations occur,
> however,
> the amount of water moving past the paddles grows ever greater.
>
> As more and more of the water from the pool is recruited into the
oscillation,
> the basin level at peak grows higher and higher, eventually exceeding the
> walls of the basin and splashing out of the basin and out of the system.
> This sets an upper limit to the current of the oscillations.
>
> I hope this simplistic answer clears up the confusion.
> There's no conflict with
> the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.
I also hope that it is realized that the primary cap empties with
each discharge. You aren't suggesting that successive primary cap
charges sum in the secondary are you? Time to get a scope onto it and
see for yourself.
Malcolm
> Bryan Kaufman
> ____________________________________________________________
> So, you think Mac is on a roll now? Just wait for OS X. This year . . .
>
>
>