[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: V-27 tube coil with staccato pulsing
-
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: V-27 tube coil with staccato pulsing
-
From: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
-
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 20:32:04 -0700
-
Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
-
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme
-
In-Reply-To: <0.47e7d3c7.2585be0d-at-aol-dot-com>
Hi Ralph,
I ran into this power thing during MMC design. All else being equal, if
you double the BPS rate, the power dissipated in the caps (proportional to
system power?) also doubles. So the BPS rate is directly proportional to
power. A sync gap gives twice the power as a non-sync rotary due to the
incorrect presentations a non-sync rotary gives. Of course, there are some
details with all this. If you double the BPS the charging circuit also
changes which makes things messy in practice.
Basically, if you charge a cap to a given energy energy level on each
bang, the system power is just dirctly proportional to the bang rate per
second. At least that's how I see it.
Cheers,
Terry
At 10:12 PM 12/12/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 12/12/99 8:10:37 PM Central Standard Time,
>tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
>
><< I can vary the
> pulsing from 30 PPS to a much lower rate, and the power input is
> reduced in proportion.>>
>
>Hi John,
>As usual you manage to twitch my interest. I understand how the power
>consumption is proportional to the numbers of BPS, but is there a mathematical
>relationship? For a given coil, is it possible to get some sort of graph of
>BPS vs
>power?
>
>Holiday cheers,
>Ralph Zekelman
>