[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Spark Gap: Flat vs. Cylinder
-
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Spark Gap: Flat vs. Cylinder
-
From: Terry Fritz <twf-at-verinet-dot-com>
-
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:37:10 -0600
-
Approved: twf-at-verinet-dot-com
-
In-Reply-To: <b0bc1e49.2440fbbe-at-aol-dot-com>
This sounds similar to my gap of last year. It works well but the cooling
fans will be a BIG plus. See the instruction graphic at:
www.peakpeak-dot-com/~terryf/tesla/misc/terrygap.jpg
for details and ideas that my help your design. I glued the pipe sections
with epoxy and used layers of paper as spacers between the sections while
the epoxy cured which makes spacing the sections very easy. There was a
lot of discussions on what the optimal spacing should be. I think 7 mil
was about the best. Also note that I could easily alter the firing voltage
by moving the sorting bar which I really liked.
Cheers,
Terry
At 03:08 PM 4/10/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Hello All,
> I'm planning on building a Flat spark gap using the following design:
>
>_______________
>|OOOOOOOOOO |
>|_______________|
>
> Using this design, i'd have my actual copper tubes enclosed on the
>top, bottom, and sides. On the back side, i plan to put in a series of fans
>to blow into the apparatus to cool it off. The side plates ensure that
>airflow will go in one direction and flow throughout this apparatus.
> Does anyone know if this design will work on the same or better level
>as the Cylindrical gaps? this design, though a little more costly, will be
>easier to build, and will be way easier to clean out.. airflow through it
>will also work out pretty well because like the cyclindrical design, the air
>has one way in and one way out.
>thanks.
>alan