[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Solid state Secondary
From: FutureT[SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 1997 12:56 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Solid state Secondary
In a message dated 97-12-31 03:28:32 EST, you write:
<<
> The first 2.5"(at the bottom of the coil)is tapered down to 11". I
> wonder how this will alter the operation of the secondary?
> Frankensteins Helper
> Max
Max,
My guess would be that minor width variations like this would not have
a noticeable effect on the coil's operation.
Coiling for today and tomorrow,
John Freau