[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Cap Location (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 00:58:51 +0000
From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Cap Location
At 05:35 AM 1/12/98 +0000, you wrote:
>
>From: Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz[SMTP:acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br]
>Sent: Monday, January 12, 1998 12:03 AM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: Cap Location
>
>John H. Couture wrote:
>
>> Tesla in the CSNotes said he thought the gap across the transformer was
>> better than the cap across the transformer as you and Mr. Cox suggest. He
>> based this on the fact that the current from the cap did not have to go thru
>> the gap to get to the TC primary winding. However, he did not make
>> comparison tests to determine which method was preferable. Also, he did not
>> address the problem of the gap OPENING.
>
>Strange. In any configuration the three elements capacitor, gap, and primary
>inductor are in series. The difference is where the power transformer is.
>
----------------------------------------------------
Antonio -
Please refer to my reply to Greg Leyh.
-----------------------------------------------------
>The capacitor alone is a good protection against overvoltage. It can't charge
>to more voltage than it had at the start of the cycle.
But this wold not be true when the gap opens when voltage transients are
formed?
John Couture