Re: coupling coefficient Arrghness ;)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: coupling coefficient Arrghness ;)
• From: Dan Kline <ntesla-at-ntesla.csd.sc.edu> (by way of Terry Fritz <terryf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 11:40:29 -0600
• Approved: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com

>>Hi Dan,
>>	In late November of last year, the methods of measuring coupling was
>>discussed.  We went on and on, but in the end, I think this one post summed
>>it all up.  There must have been 50 posts on this subject then!!  I
>>remember it, because I started it :-))

My apologies to the list for re-starting this thread. I searched the
archives and got a ton of good info. (It's completely my fault too...though
I've been on the list for 3 years, I have ~22 Megs of unread mail. I guess
it's time to get caught up ;)

Later, 

Dan

• Prev: Re: new power transformer (variac as ballast)
• Next: Re: Electroplating
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread