magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 23:37:37 -0600
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

----------
From:  Malcolm Watts [SMTP:MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
Sent:  Sunday, March 22, 1998 3:21 PM
To:  tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject:  Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)

<snip>

> Did you mention the inductance values you used in your tests, I don't
> seem to remember seeing them?  The inductance ratio made a big
> difference in my tests, but now I'm seeing still new factors which I've
> described in another posting.
> 
> John Freau

I did. The tertiary was somewhere around 5mH, the secondary about 
350uH and the primary around 8mH. I agree the inductance ratio will 
make a big difference.

***** That should of course be Lp = 8uH.  Sorry all :(

Malcolm

• Prev: Where do I get Tungsten welding electrodes?
• Next: coiler location list - last call
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread