magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 08:52:46 -0600
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

----------
From:  FutureT [SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent:  Sunday, March 22, 1998 6:41 AM
To:  tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject:  Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)

In a message dated 98-03-22 01:40:55 EST, you write:

<< 
> I am personally happy with the results I've obtained. As I say, k for 
> my driver was somewhere between 0.4 and 0.5 and I obtained overall
> k with unequivocal resolution from the scope of less that 0.1. In fact 
> I have the first piccies of the traces back now. I will scope the 
> same driver with different primaries and different resonators at some 
> stage.
 
 Malcolm >>

Malcolm,

Did you mention the inductance values you used in your tests, I don't
seem to remember seeing them?  The inductance ratio made a big
difference in my tests, but now I'm seeing still new factors which I've
described in another posting.

John Freau

• Prev: PRIMARY??
• Next: First Coil Test at WPI
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread