From: Jim Lux [SMTP:James.P.Lux-at-jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 12:45 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Strike Rail
Tesla List wrote:
> From: Julian Green [SMTP:julian-at-kbss.bt.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 4:22 AM
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Strike Rail
> > The strike rail is not a complete turn with about 2" gap to avoid shorted
> > turn problems.
> > I changed it from the picture. This time my plumbing came up to the rail
> > via a nice curve then fitted into a right angle joint (running
> > horizontally). I concluded it could only be due to this. So instead of the
> > right angle pipe joint I curved it with a radius of about 3". Now the
> > problem has gone away.
> > The reason for passing on this info is that I know some people have suffered
> > from breakout in the middle of the secondary but I do not recall any mention
> > of strike rail geometry's as possible problems.
> > Regards
> > Viv Watts UK.
> I have had a similar problem and found that any objects comming near to the
> secondary can cause corona discharge.
Anything that disturbs the nonuniformity of the field will increase the
local Efield, and if it gets above 30kV/cm, you'll get corona or
sparks. I control the voltage of my Van deGraaf generator by bringing a
small diameter sphere that is grounded close to it. It doesn't spark
over, but it does bleed off the charge. In fact, this is a standard
technique for controlling VDG output, you put some sort of variable
resistance (e.g. a vacuum tube) in series with the corona point driven
by something that measures the voltage (typically the position of an ion
beam going through some magnets).