Secondary Coil Turns

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Secondary Coil Turns
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:51:30 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

----------
From:  Barton B. Anderson [SMTP:mopar-at-uswest-dot-net]
Sent:  Friday, June 12, 1998 11:49 PM
To:  Tesla List
Subject:  Re: Secondary Coil Turns

Mike,
I personally don't know all the implications about superconductivity and these
circuits, but know it has been discussed from time to time on the list. To my memory,
there seemed to be more cons than pros, but you could verify this in the Tesla List
Archives.
FWIW,
Bart

Tesla List wrote:

> ----------
> From:  Michael Nolley [SMTP:mhnolley-at-willamette.edu]
> Sent:  Friday, June 12, 1998 9:39 AM
> To:  Tesla List
> Cc:  'Tesla List'
> Subject:  Re: Secondary Coil Turns
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Tesla List wrote:
>
>  I would be interested to see how superconductivity research will affect
> TC's, laboratory built or otherwise, in the next couple of years..
> eliminating losses due to resistance would magnify the output
> considerably.  I imagine, though that we're at least 10-15 years away
> since superconductors are notoriously difficult to engineer-- any
> comments on the implications, though?
>
>                 --Mike

• Prev: Secondary Coil Turns
• Next: New cap test run
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread