[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
1/4 Wave Theories - do a test?
----------
From: Mad Coiler [SMTP:tesla_coiler-at-hotmail-dot-com]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 1998 1:29 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: 1/4 Wave Theories - do a test?
>----------
>From: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com [SMTP:terryf-at-verinet-dot-com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 04, 1998 8:53 AM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: 1/4 Wave Theories - do a test?
>
>Hi Tristan,
>
>At 08:04 PM 6/3/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>----------
>>From: Mad Coiler [SMTP:tesla_coiler-at-hotmail-dot-com]
>>Sent: Monday, June 01, 1998 9:45 PM
>>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>>Subject: Re: 1/4 Wave Theories - do a test?
>>
>I have
>no data that would suggest that only the wire length being at or near
the
>1/4 wavelength of your coil's operating frequency would make the
difference
>you are seeing.
This is exactly my point - that the wire length in my system doesnt
appear to have a significant impact on frequency response and
performance.
>In my opinion, other factors such as quenching, coupling coefficient,
and
>the change in component values are accounting for your observations.
Guys, I am not trying to disprove the 1/4wave theory. But what
significance is it if by simply tapping in a few turns on the pri coil
(and a bigger toroid) makes such a dramatic improvement over when the
system was all set up using 1/4 wave values?
Perhaps my small coil is such an odd design that its operation is
slightly different? For example, I have been told that my small coil
doesnt have enough inductance or turns per inch to be a good performer.
It is 3.5" diameter, 15" high, wound with #22. # of turns ~530, mH = 5.4
Powering this little guy with a 12Kv 60mA NST produces 30" sparks (about
16"-22" sparks when tunned to 1/4wavelength). I am also using only dirt
cheap hocky puck caps.
Tristan Stewart