Re: Secondary Frequency(fwd)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Secondary Frequency(fwd)
• From: Richard Hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net> (by way of terryf-at-verinet-dot-com)
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 16:35:47 -0600
• Approved: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com

Tesla List wrote:

> From: "Barton B. Anderson" <mopar-at-uswest-dot-net>
>
> Richard,
> Now I understand the rule. Yes, your right of course. If for some reason
> you want
> to hit a particular frequency, over-wind and cut it down. I LIKE IT!  Of
> course,
> the second half of the fun are calcs and theorizing what variables /
> unknowns got
> in the way. BTW, excellent post!!
> Bart

Bart,
I always live and let live.  There is always more than one way to skin a cat.
what works for one might be abhorent to another.  It's the human factor that
makes this whole business interesting for me.

Richard Hull, TCBOR

• Prev: Re: Ball Lightning (Moderator Comment)
• Next: Re: new power transformer (variac as ballast)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread