Re: Fw: Input frequency (fwd)

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Fw: Input frequency (fwd)
From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:36:07 -0600 (MDT)
Approved: mod1-at-pupman-dot-com



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:12:22 +0100
From: "chris.swinson" <chris.swinson-at-zetnet.co.uk>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Input frequency (fwd)


-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: 04 August 1998 03:09
Subject: Re: Fw: Input frequency (fwd)


>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:51:26 -0700
>From: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br>
>To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Subject: Re: Fw: Input frequency (fwd)
>
>Tesla List wrote:
>
>> Say if you had a Neon say, 10Kv at 50ma running on the usual 230V 50Hz
>> mains.  As far as I can gather if you use 230V input but at 100Hz you
would
>> actually get 20Kv at 50ma, thus more wattage input.  Has anyone tried
this.
>> It may stress the Neon transformer but would this work ?
>
>This is incorrect. The voltage will remain at the same level, and the
current
>(short-circuit) will decrease to 25 mA, since it is limited by the
inductive
>reactance of the output, that is proportional to the frequency.
>
>Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
>
>
>
I'n not convinced at all.  I have just said something about why I say this
on another mail.

thanks for you thoughts :-)

chris.swinson-at-zetnet.co.uk