Re: And what of the FCC?

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: And what of the FCC?
From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 09:14:57 -0600 (MDT)
Approved: mod1-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:39:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: And what of the FCC?

At 06:51 AM 9/25/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>From: 	Julian Green[SMTP:julian-at-kbss.bt.co.uk]
>Sent: 	Thursday, September 25, 1997 4:00 AM
>To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: 	Re: And what of the FCC?
>
>
>----- Begin Included Message -----
>...snip
>
>> long wire (200 footer).  The tone of the gap would be the dead giveaway.  He
>> heard- zippo.
>
>That is very good news!  How about your immediate neighbors?  Have they ever
>had any complaints, other than about the large 'buzzsaw' in your woodshed?
>
>
>-GL
>----- End Included Message -----
>
>
>My first coil resonated at 220KHz which is on the LW band of a domestic radio.
>
>I did a walk test and at close range (20 meters) I could tune into the coil.
>At 150 meters - zippo.
>
>Julian Green
>
>
>Julian,

It is nice to know that someone else has done the obvious.  Tesla coils just
don't, (or shouldn't, if built right), put out much EM radiation in the form
of RF.  That's why we can disregard much of classic radio theory.  They are
shooting for one thing, we are shooting for another.

Richard Hull, TCBOR
>