[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Magnetic quenched gaps [electromagnets]
From: richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 1997 7:26 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Magnetic quenched gaps [electromagnets]
At 01:47 PM 9/19/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>From: Alfred A. Skrocki[SMTP:alfred.skrocki-at-cybernetworking-dot-com]
>Sent: Friday, September 19, 1997 3:04 AM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: Magnetic quenched gaps
>
>On Tuesday, September 16, 1997 6:01 PM Richard Hull
>[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net] wrote;
>
>> >Dale,
>>
>> You need lotsa' gauss in a largish air gap for proper quench and thus this
>> method is best used on smaller systems as a concept demonstration. The
>> newer Ne:Fe:B magnets are far too heat sensitive to use near hot gap
>> structures as they reach their curie point at very low temperature levels.
>> Ferrite is a bit too weak and alnico a bit too expensive for assembling a
>> really large and effective magnetic quench gaps system for a giant system.
>
>So, why not use electro-magnets? I think electro-magnets still
>produce a higher gauss per unit size than the best permanent magnets,
>correct me if I'm wrong on that. The core could be made of a high
>curie point feromagnetic alloy.
>
>
The mag field of a modern super magnet is many times that which the average
amateur could cobble up (effectively). Plus, the field is free and ever
present. A good solenoid and custom core assembly with the requisite 1" ++
air gap with a minimum of 4000 guass in it, would be expensive and consume a
whole lot of power. I have done it both ways and the best system used
modern high energy rare earth magnets and a custom milled and reworked neon
transformer "H" core.
Richard Hull, TCBOR