[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Magnetic quenched gaps
From: Alfred A. Skrocki[SMTP:alfred.skrocki-at-cybernetworking-dot-com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 8:54 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Magnetic quenched gaps
On Tuesday, September 16, 1997 6:32 PM Dale F. Pfaffle
[SMTP:pfaffle-at-tele-net-dot-net] wrote;
> Being new here this may have been discussed before but, I have not seen
> anyone mention quenching with a magnetic field. Are they not very good, to
> hard to tune/maintain, or the other methods are just better.
> Thanks,
Incredible! I was honestly just thinking of opening up the subject of
magnetic quenching, while reading todays messages, and here you
went and beat me to the punch! I suspect we hear so little about
magnetic quenching because it is not as well understood as the less
subtle rotary gaps or stationary gaps with a fan. I don't know if
anyone has ever done any serious work to compare a magnetically
quenched gap to a fan quenched stationary gap or a rotary. I always
liked the subtlety of the magnetically quenched gap though. I was
going to ask if anyone out there is currently playing with magnetic
quenching.
Sincerely
\\\|///
\\ ~ ~ //
( -at- -at- )
-----o00o-(_)-o00o-----
Alfred A. Skrocki
Alfred.Skrocki-at-CyberNetworking-dot-com
.ooo0 0ooo.
-----( )---( )-----
\ ( ) /
\_) (_/