Re: RE- Transformer question

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: RE- Transformer question
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:53:18 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	DamDeName-at-aol-dot-com[SMTP:DamDeName-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Thursday, September 11, 1997 11:52 AM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: RE- Transformer question

  Hi Dave--

My only thought on the "couple" as far as 
any problem that might manefest is core saturation ---
per haps the geometry is not clear though.

regards,
                sandy

In a message dated 97-09-10 04:49:33 EDT, you write:

<< T>Hi Everyone,
 T>I thought some comments from the knowledge of this group would be helpful
 T>before I try this.  I have two H&R transformers which I want to submerse
in
 T>oil. In order to save space I would like to do the following. The
transformer
 T>have the 'E' and 'I' laminatio
 T>ns and all the 'E's and 'I's are on together, not alternated the way some
 T>transformer are built. My question is can the 'I' section be removed from
eac
 T>transformer and then couple the two together? I would of course phase the
 T>primaries so the field is correc
 T>t. My initial thoughts are that this should work, but I often overlook the
 T>obvious.  I hope it is clear what I want to do.
 T>Any comments would be appreciated.
 T>Dave Huffman >>

• Prev: FW: To Kevin
• Next: Re: Interesting but not so impressive results...
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread