Re: A Puzzle

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: A Puzzle
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 13:13:09 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Greg Leyh[SMTP:lod-at-pacbell-dot-net]
Sent: 	Sunday, September 07, 1997 5:35 AM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: A Puzzle

DR.RESONANCE wrote:


> To: Rich Wall
> 
> Theory or not withstanding, it has come to within 2% of actual measured
> value and that works well enough for our purposes.  For exacting research
> work, I agree, it is not accurate enough.


> > Unfortunately, your method is severely flawed.  There was a long thread
> > on the the interconverability of electrostatic coulombs and EM coulombs
> > this last year.  The original experimental method proposing to connect
> > the two is severely lacking.  R. Hull has written elegant posts in this
> > regard.  You may refer to the archives or perhaps Richard may choose to
> > comment on this old information.
> >
> > RWW


2%, and not 0.000...% ???  You guys are privy to some experimental data 
that I must have missed.  Can either of you explain?


-GL

• Prev: Re: Update to web pages.
• Next: RE- Core forms
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread