Re: A Puzzle

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: A Puzzle
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 18:48:49 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Malcolm Watts[SMTP:MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
Sent: 	Wednesday, September 03, 1997 5:03 PM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: A Puzzle

Thanks for thinks Jim.

> From:   bmack[SMTP:bmack-at-frontiernet-dot-net]
> Sent:   Tuesday, September 02, 1997 10:42 PM
> To:     Tesla List
> Subject:    Re: A Puzzle

> Perhaps it's an experimental method problem. You wrote that "under
> one shot conditions" the voltages were about the same.  I don't know
> what means  were used to produce the one shot, but I suspect that
> the release of energy may have been more abrupt than under normal
> operating conditions. This would produce more voltage in the more 
> inductive device due to  V= Ldi/dt .
> 
> Jim M

I have scoped them as being identical.

Regards,
Malcolm 

• Prev: Re: capacitor
• Next: Re: A Puzzle
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread