Re: Magnifier vs Classical TC (fwd)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Magnifier vs Classical TC (fwd)
• From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 22:58:13 -0600 (MDT)
• Approved: mod1-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 03:51:51 +0000
From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Magnifier vs Classical TC 

<SNIP>
-------------------------------------------------------

  John F. -

  I agree the maggy may produce more power and, therefore, more secondary
volts. Tesla needed ultra high voltages for his world electrical system and
the maggy appears to be the best way to produce these voltages.

  Tesla said his system would be using currents flowing in the ionosphere.
Ultra high voltages are necessary to do this efficiently. Note that the
ionosphere is a monstrous conductor surrounding the earth. With ultra high
voltages the currents would be very small and the losses negligible. Tesla
pointed this out in his writings.

  Tesla also said his system would not use Hertzian waves (electrical
radiant energy) because these waves can escape from the ionosphere
(conductor) resulting in large losses. On the other hand, the electrical
currents would be confined to the ionosphere (conductor) only.

  John Couture

• Prev: Re: Non-Linear Coil Winding Experiment. (and more tests!)
• Next: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread