Re: Pri-Sec Phasing

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Pri-Sec Phasing
• From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 21:02:54 -0600 (MDT)
• Approved: mod1-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 18:54:31 +0000
From: Greg Leyh <lod-at-pacbell-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Pri-Sec Phasing 

Thomas McGahee wrote:


> Greg,
> I agree with Malcolm. If what the book said was true, then if you
> bifilar wound two primary coils and then connected the start of the
> windings together and then the endings together you would have a
> current flow between them due to their supposedly opposite
> polarities. But that just ain't so.

That is true, assuming both parallel filaments make up a primary
winding.  But what if one filament was the primary(sourcing power), 
and the other was the secondary(removing power)?


-GL

• Prev: Re: Pri-Sec Phasing
• Next: New Mini-Mag hits the road!
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread