Re: Superconducting magnifier

To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Superconducting magnifier
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 23:13:37 -0600
Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Robert W. Stephens[SMTP:rwstephens-at-headwaters-dot-com]
Reply To: 	rwstephens-at-headwaters-dot-com
Sent: 	Sunday, November 09, 1997 8:05 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Superconducting magnifier

> 
> From: 	Ted[SMTP:tedric-at-generation-dot-net]
> Sent: 	Sunday, November 09, 1997 3:19 AM
> To: 	Tesla List
> Subject: 	Re: Superconducting magnifier
> 
> >From: 	Jim Lux[SMTP:jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net]
> >Sent: 	Tuesday, November 04, 1997 10:13 AM
> >To: 	Tesla List
> >Subject: 	Re: Superconducting magnifier
 <snip>

Ted wrote: 

> Right now, I am pondering over this: "Liquid oxygen is magnetic and is an
> insulator (no eddy current). Will using liquid oxygen as core material
> improve the coupling? And what about using an oudin coil to power an extra
> coil?"
> 
> 
> Ted

Ted, 

My memory tells me that LOX is a darned good conductor of 
electricity.

rwstephens